Thursday 30 October 2014

Oct 30 2014 Discussion

Please click on the link below and watch the news video. Also, consider your opinions regarding the discussion questions. Thanks!

1)     If you were a parent, would you want the school to be able to track (follow digitally) your child?
2)     If you were a student, would you want your school to be able to track you?
a.       Would you change or tamper with the tracking device in your student ID?
3)     Do students need a student ID in Korea or Japan?
4)     What kind of students do you think this tracking system would benefit (be good for)?

5)     The schools would be investing a lot of money in these new tracking systems, do you think it is money intelligently spent?

Wednesday 29 October 2014

Oct 29/14 Student Chosen Discussion

Thanks for the topic, Ella!

Please check out this short article and consider the questions provided below.

How to Diversify Teaching

Introduction

Teachersr
Finding a male teacher in an American classroom is hard.
Finding a black male teacher is even harder. 
The teaching profession is dominated by women:
Three-quarters of all teachers in kindergarten through high school are female, and in elementary and middle schools,
 women account for more than 80 percent of the educators.

What’s more, more than 80 percent of America’s teachers are white,
even though minority students are expected to outnumber white students in public schools for the first time this year.

QUESTIONS

Do you think that men and women teach differently?
Do you think that boys and girls learn differently?
How can the teaching profession become more diverse in terms of gender and race or ethnicity?
In your country, What is the ratio of men to women in the classroom?
Do you think this is discrimination?
Why do you think more men are not interested in teaching early grades?



Tuesday 28 October 2014

Oct 28, 2014

Please watch this video and do your best to understand the language. He has a bit of an accent, but if you watch it a time or two, I think you'll be alright. Laugh too!

Matthew

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFQfylQ2Jgg

Wednesday 22 October 2014

Oct 23 2014 Discussion Topic

We will be watching a video in class and discussing the topic of drinking and driving.
Please think about the following questions:

1) Is drinking and driving a problem in your country?
2) Are there strict laws about drinking and driving in your country?
3) Have you seen any anti-drinking and driving advertisements? What makes a good ad?
4) If you had a friend or family member who drank and drove, how would you convince them to stop?

See you in class!

Oct 22 2014 Student Chosen Discussion

#BBCtrending: Ebola Halloween costume: humour or horror?

Almost 30,000 people have taken to social media this month to debate whether Ebola-themed Halloween costumes, be they home-made or store-bought, are a great idea or yet another indication of society's moral decay.
Brands on Sale is advertising the "Ebola containment suit costume, a kit that includes a protective bodysuit, goggles and breathing mask. Johnathon Weeks, the company's vice president, says they sold about two dozen on Wednesday and expect to move well over a thousand by the end of the month.
"This is an Ebola containment healthcare worker costume; it's not the Ebola disease costume; it's not an Ebola victim costume," says Mr Weeks. "It's no different in my eyes than what a firefighter costume would be, or doctors and nurses costume. Those people save lives every day, just like these people are."
Making light of tragedy is a common way people cope with their greatest fears, according to Penn State Altoona Prof Jerry Zolten, who teaches a class in stand-up comedy. It's also an easy way to get a big reaction.

"Some people delight in shocking their friends and are among the first to tell jokes about things that are putting fear in everybody's minds," Zolten says.
He says a joke like this can be a way to deal with stress.
"It's well known that people who are in high-risk jobs - ambulance workers, people who see horrible things all the time - will joke about it amongst themselves right there on the job, as needed."
He cautions, however, that this doesn't always extend to the general public.

Indeed, for many online, donning an Ebola-themed Halloween costume seems like a callous way to approach a serious situation.
Chances are that the appearance of trick-or-treater or Halloween partygoer dressed in a bio-hazard suit will cause more unease than laughter, as similarly-clad healthcare workers scramble to deal with a disease that has left thousands dead in Western Africa.
Reporting by Micah Luxen


QUESTION
1.    What is your opinion about this article? Do you think wearing a costume like this would be funny, or insulting?
2.    In your country, what does Halloween day mean?
3.    If you are invited to Halloween party, what are you going to dress up as? Why?
4.    How do you deal with stress? Do you get sad, angry, quiet, or start to joke?
5.    It is true that people in high stress jobs sometimes joke to cure the stress. Is it okay for them to joke? Is it okay for you (or your friends) to joke about the same things even though you don’t do those high stress jobs?


I’m sorry to choose long article,,,,,,,

Thursday 16 October 2014

Oct 17 2014 Discussion

Please read the following article and have a good think about your opinion and your possible future experiences. Remember, read once without a dictionary. Read again with one. Read again without one.

See you in class!

Apprenticeships? It's the 1950’s and 60’s all over again 


You could be forgiven for a sense of deja vu over today’s story that top performing A-level students are shunning going to university to take up apprenticeships.
What goes around comes around. Apprenticeships were very much in vogue in the 1950’s and 60’s. Now they are back in fashion.
There is one difference, though, and it is crucial one. The university places just weren’t there in the 50’s and 60’s. Apprenticeships were the only option for many.
I welcome their return - it’s just a pity that they seem to have gained their new popularity through the negative route of would-be students being put off by the rise in university fees to £9,000 a year.
And we have to guard against any snobbish attitude towards them and hope no-one dismisses them on the grounds they don’t cut the mustard. No “sorry, dear boy, but I mean - only an apprentice!” then.  You have to get to the situation where a parent is just as proud of a child for adopting this route as going for a traditional university course.
The reason I like apprenticeships is they can provide the skills sets needed by particular industries.  If a school leaver knows his or her mind and what they want to do, why not opt for them.
In a funny way, they are delivering on the target set by Tony Blair when he was Prime Minister when he set a target of 50 per cent of young people going on to higher education.  He never meant they should all be taking academic subjects at the country’s most elite universities.  This, I believe, is the kind of mix he wanted but the message never quite got across.
By Richard Garner – the Independent - Thursday 15 August 2013



Related articles:





Discussion Questions


With your partner, discuss the following questions. Feel free to ask any follow-on questions you like.


1.     What do you think of apprenticeships? Are they a good idea? 


2.     Is it really that important to graduate from university?


3.     Do you think the cost of tuition fees is worth paying? Is it a good investment?

 
4.     Does university adequately prepare students to join the work force? 


5.     What percentage of the population do you think should be educated to university level?  Why? 


6.     Do you regret any of the choices you made regarding your education or career?
If you could go back and change things, what would you change?


7.     Do you have any advice for your classmates on the best route to success?


8.     If you ran the country, what policies would you enact with regard to education, training, employment, tuition fees, student debt, etc in order to ensure a healthy economic future for everyone?


Think about your future

Role play for 2-3 students

Student A:
You are in your final year of high school. You are a good student and expect to leave school with good enough grades to be get into university but you are not really sure if you want to do it or not. You are considering applying for an apprenticeship with a local company. You don’t particularly enjoy studying and you would like to start earning money and avoid getting into debt.

Students B & C:
You are student A’s parents. You have your heart set on seeing your child graduating from a good university and getting a high powered job after graduation.


Pretend you are having a family discussion around the dinner table about student A’s options after high school.


Wednesday 15 October 2014

October 16 2014 Discussion Topic


Please scroll down to the October 7, 2014 Blog discussion.
As this was not talked about while I was away, we will be discussing it today.
The topic is regarding a man who beat the bank at its own game.

Enjoy the reading!

See you tomorrow!

Matthew

P.S. Don't forget the presentations

Student blog topic Oct 15 2014




1. What is your opinion about abortion?

2. How can we control abortion? Should the government control abortion?

3. Is abortion morally right?

4. Who do you think (the mother or father), has the ultimate decision to abort a pregnancy?

5. "They [the abortion clinics] have bulletproof glass, gated driveways and multiple locking doors throughout.
They do not advertise and do not use doctors' names."
It is rather dangerous for a clinic to perform abortions in some parts of the world. Who do you think is in the wrong, the clinic, or those who oppose the clinics?
6. What is the opinion of abortions in your home country and in your home region of the world?

Monday 13 October 2014

October 14, 2014 Discussion

Howdy!
I will very soon return from my vacation and I'm looking forward to this discussion.
I hope everyone had a great long weekend!

Please read the article, watch the video, and consider the questions that I have provided below.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-29336968

1. Do you think $1 and $50 is enough to motivate people to compost?

2. Is this law (or one like it) already in place in your home city? Is it needed?

3. "Up to 40% of food in the USA is wasted." What is you reaction to this statement?

4. What other environmentally friendly actions should the government make new laws about? Can you think of any other laws already in place?

5. Do you think health related laws should be made? (e.g. You must be over 18 to get McDonald's food).

6. Do you or your family waste food? Is there a 'leftover culture' in your home country? Do families reheat yesterdays food?

Thursday 2 October 2014

Oct 9 2014 Discussion

Please read and consider the following article and questions.
Be ready to discuss. It's more fun that way!
Look up any words you don't know on the second read.

See you on Tuesday! I'm on vacation ! (You should read this for Thursday, Oct 9.)

Test-Tube Burger Served Up For First Time
The world's first test-tube burger, costing a whopping £250,000 to produce, has been unveiled in London.
The 5oz patty - made from lab-grown "cultured beef" - was dished up by its creator, Professor Mark Post, before journalists in Hammersmith, in the west of the capital. The scientist-turned-chef made the most expensive beefburger in history from 20,000 tiny strips of meat grown from cow stem cells over a three-month period. The billionaire co-founder of Google, Sergey Brin, put £215,000 of his own money towards the research, saying he was doing it because it could be "transformative for the world".
Chef Richard McGeown fried the burger in sunflower oil and a knob of butter before it was sampled by Josh Schonwald, author of The Taste of Tomorrow, and food scientist Hanni Rutzler. Ms Rutzler said it was "close to meat" but she was expecting the texture to be softer and it wasn't very juicy. Mr Schonwald said the "absence is the fat ... it's a leanness to it but the bite feels like a conventional hamburger". "This is kind of an unnatural experience in that I can't tell you over the past 20 years how many times I have had a burger without ketchup or onions or jalapenos or bacon."
Prof Post believes his artificial meat - known by the rather unappetising title "in-vitro meat" - could herald a food revolution and appear in supermarkets within the next 10 to 20 years. After trying his own creation for the first time, he said: "I think it's a very good start, it proved that we can do this, that we can make it and to provide a start to build upon - I am very pleased with it." He said he was not worried about the verdict on the taste and added that in a couple of months they should be able to add fat into the product.
The burger could help save the planet by cutting the billions of tonnes of greenhouse gases currently released by livestock, and may also be deemed ethically acceptable by vegetarians because it would dramatically reduce the need to slaughter animals. But its success or failure will ultimately depend on how much it resembles the taste, texture and price of real meat.
The demonstration was originally planned for October last year, with celebrity chef Heston Blumenthal cooking the burger for a mystery guest. There was pressure from journalists in the audience who wanted to try the burger but they were told there was not enough to go around. Up until now, the only outsider known to have eaten the synthetic meat was a Russian reporter who snatched a piece of cultured pork and stuffed it in his mouth during a visit to Prof Post's lab - before it had been passed as safe to eat. He was reportedly unimpressed by the pork, describing it as "chewy and tasteless".
Prof Post's team at the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands conducted experiments which progressed from mouse meat to pork and finally beef - the most environmentally destructive meat. "What we are going to attempt is important because I hope it will show cultured beef has the answers to major problems that the world faces," he said. "Our burger is made from muscle cells taken from a cow. We haven't altered them in any way. For it to succeed it has to look, feel and hopefully taste like the real thing."
The ingredients don't sound like something a chef would boast about on a menu - half-millimetre thick strips of pinkish yellow lab-grown tissue, each the size of a rice grain. But Prof Post is confident he can produce a burger that is almost indistinguishable from one made from prime beef. He points out that livestock farming is becoming unsustainable, with demand for meat rocketing around the world.
The industry accounts for nearly 20% of all greenhouse gas emissions - even greater than transport - with 228 million tonnes of meat produced each year. And the environmental problems are only likely to get worse, with the UN forecasting that world demand for meat will double by 2050, largely driven by an increased demand from a growing middle class in China and other developing nations. Added to this, around 70% of all farmland is devoted to meat production, and cattle consume around 10% of the world's freshwater supplies, making meat farming a very costly, planet-damaging business.
Experts say 1kg of meat requires up to 10kg of crops to produce, making it a highly inefficient method of turning plants into human food, whereas synthetic meat uses about 2kg of feed. Research by Oxford University scientists in 2011 estimated that cultured meat needs 99% less land than livestock, between 82% and 96% less water, and produces between 78% and 95% less greenhouse gas.
The burger launched today has cost  £250,000 to produce, but the Dutch team are hoping to dramatically slash the cost by industrialising the laborious process. The Food Standards Agency said that before going on sale, synthetic meat would need regulatory approval, with manufacturers needing to prove that all necessary safety tests had been carried out.

By Alex Watts, Sky News Online - Monday 05 August 2013




Discussion Questions


With your partner, discuss the following questions. Feel free to ask any follow-on questions you like.


1.     What are your initial thoughts on this story? Is this a good idea? 


2.     Do you think you could get used to eating artificial meat products? Will it become popular?

 
3.     Do you think artificial meat will be “transformative for the world”?   In what ways?


4.     Can you think of any possible negative side effects if artificial meat catches on? 


5.     If we all start consuming artificial meats, what will be done with all the farmland that will no longer be needed? What would you like to see done with it?


6.     What other technological advances would you like to see in your lifetime?  Why?


7.     Does it bother you that animals must suffer and die so you can enjoy the taste of meat?


8.     Have you ever considered becoming a vegetarian?
If you are a vegetarian, would you eat artificial meat?


9.     Are you a fussy eater?  Explain.


10.  What is the strangest thing you have ever eaten?






Oct 7 2014 Discussion

Please read this and consider the questions. You will be discussing it in class.
Make sure that you are prepared and ready to share you opinion as clearly as you can.
Look up any words you do not know during the second time you read.

Have fun!

Man Tries to Beat Bank at its Own Game with Fine Print that Gives Him Unlimited Credit

When it comes to fine print on user agreements and terms of service, I’ve found that there are those who blame companies for making these documents so long and complicated that most people will never read them (and might not even be able to understand the terms even after reading them), and then there are those who say consumers can’t complain if they don’t first read and understand everything they agree to. Here’s a story out of Russia that should appeal to both sides of that debate.
RT News has the story of a man who looked at an unsolicited credit card offer from Tinkoff Credit Systems back in 2008 and wondered what would happen if he signed the agreement, but only after writing in his own additional terms by hand.
Among the amendments in his version of the contract — unlimited credit, 0% APR, no fees, including the stipulation that he “is not obliged to pay any fees and charges imposed by bank tariffs.” Since the contract included a URL for a web page containing the full terms of service, the customer also wrote in a new URL of his own so that the bank couldn’t just say “but these terms are different than what’s published on the site.”
Per the amended terms, every change to these terms would result in a payment of 3 million rubles ($91,000) to the customer, or a cancelation fee of 6 million rubles ($182,000).
A pretty sweet deal. No way Tinkoff would agree to it.
But of course Tinkoff did agree to it, because it did exactly what most of its customers do — accepted this contract without reading it.
“The opened credit line was unlimited,” said the man’s lawyer. “He could afford to buy an island somewhere in Malaysia, and the bank would have to pay for it by law.”
He didn’t buy that island, but he did use the card for two years, racking up only $1,363 (including interest and fees) during that time. Not bad, considering the sweet deal he’d written for himself. But of course he wasn’t paying that amount because he maintained that he had a 0% APR and could theoretically just keep making charges on the sheer promise that he’d pay up someday.
And so Tinkoff sued the customer. However, the court held that his amendments were binding since the bank accepted them, whether it looked at them or not. The court said the customer only owed the principal balance of around $575.
Perhaps emboldened by this victory, the customer then sued Tinkoff for a whopping $727,000 for its failure to honor the amended agreement and for not paying out the agreed-upon penalty of $182,000 when it cancelled his account.
“They signed the documents without looking,” explains his lawyer. “They said what their borrowers usually say in court: ‘We have not read it.’”
Tinkoff insists that it will be vindicated and that the customer will ultimately get four years in prison for fraud instead of the pile of cash he sought.
“We don’t have small print, everything is clear and transparent,” wrote the bank’s founder on Twitter. “Try to open a card – then we’ll talk. Stealing is a sin – in my opinion, of course. Not all in Russia think so.”
By Chris Morran – Consumerist - August 9, 2013


Related articles:



Discussion Questions
With your partner, discuss the following questions. Feel free to ask any follow-on questions you like.


1.     What are your thoughts on this story?  Whose side are you on, the man or the bank?
Who do you think will win in the end?


2.     Do you usually read the small print before you sign documents?  Do you usually understand it?

 
3.     Have you ever regretted not reading the small print more carefully?   


4.     Are you good at managing your finances or you often find yourself spending more than you intended to?


5.     Do you have any financial tips for your classmates to help them manage their finances better?


6.     Are you happy with the service that your bank/credit card provider gives you? Do you ever have problems with them? Have you ever complained or contested any fees they charged you?


7.     Do you think that banks in general treat their customers well? Explain


8.     If you had a credit card with 0% APR and unlimited credit, what would you do with it?