Wednesday 21 January 2015

Discussion Jan 22 2015


This one is all about drinking. I hope you enjoy the twist on the topic!

Please read it and be ready for class tomorrow.

See you there!

David Nutt Develops 'Alcohol Substitute' Drug
That Could Mean Getting Drunk Without The Hangover
It could be a dream come true. Scientists have developed a drug which mimics all the positive effects of being drunk, without any of the health risks, addiction - or, crucially, hangovers.
Former government adviser Proffessor David Nutt said the discovery would lead to a "serious revolution in health."
The drug targets the brain to give the taker fuzzy feelings of pleasure similar to the effects of drinking.
However, taking a simple antidote can block the effects immediately, leaving the user free to drive or return to work without a groggy head.
"It sounds like science fiction but these ambitions are well within the grasp of modern neuroscience," the scientist wrote in the Guardian.
The professor, who was fired from his post as the Government's chief drugs advisor in 2009 for saying cannabis, ecstasy and LSD are less harmful than alcohol and cigarettes, claimed the drug would do for alcohol what the e-cigarette had done for smoking.
His revolutionary drug could be on the market within two years - if someone will fund his research into it.
He called on the Government to give an "explicit recommendation" in support of the drug to encourage investment, saying his innovation could save the NHS millions, with the Government currently forking out £3.5billion a year on alcohol-related illness.
Prof Nutt, who once claimed that taking ecstasy is no more dangerous than riding a horse, and his team at Imperial College London have hit a stumbling block with their research and are now appealing for funds.
Unsurprisingly, no one in the drinks industry is keen to fund the drug's development.
Debate has already been sparked by those who enjoy the social aspects of drinking, along with the taste of a wine or beer, while others have questioned whether people, including motorists, will remember to take the antidote.
One Twitter user called the drug "creepy", comparing it to the ritualistic drink 'Soma' in Aldous Huxley's distopian fantasy Brave New World, while others reacted joyfully to the news they could effectively 'get drunk' and go to work unhindered the next day.
Speaking to the Dragon's Den presenter Evan Davis on the BBC's Today programme this morning, Prof Nutt appealed for investors to come forward and support his ground-breaking research.
He said: "I think this would be a serious revolution in health... just like the e-cigarette is going to revolutionise the smoking of tobacco.
"I find it weird that we haven't been speaking about this before, as it's such a target for health improvement."
The Professor said that the drug would be taken in the form of a range of cocktails, and added he had given it a go himself.
"I've done the prototype experiments myself many years ago, where I've been inebriated and then it's been reversed by the antagonist," he said.
"That's what really gave us the idea. There's no question that you can produce a whole range of effects like alcohol by manipulating the brain."
The charity Alcohol Concern argued people might become addicted to the alcohol substitute and said the Government would be better focusing on policies such as the minimum pricing of booze, the Daily Mail reported.

The Huffington Post UK | By Charlotte Meredith Posted: 12/11/2013


Sunday 18 January 2015

Blog discussion Jan 20 2015


Please read the article posted below and be ready to discuss your opinion in class.

I hope you're enjoying the slightly warmer, if rainy, weather!

Matthew

Engagement Rings Are Actually 'Insulting'
INSULTING 'TO NOTIONS OF ACTUAL LOVE,' THAT IS: TAURIQ MOOSA

(NEWSER) – Diamonds have "little intrinsic value," writes Tauriq Moosa in the Guardian, so when large South African diamond mines were discovered in the late 1800s and De Beers Consolidates Mines was formed, its investors realized they would need to conjure up demand. That they were incredibly successful with their marketing is no surprise (who hasn't heard the tagline, "A diamond is forever"?). And yet we've forgotten that it's just that—marketing. Here's the truth, per Moosa: a diamond has nothing to do with your relationship or its permanence.

Rather, it's a useless bauble, it's overpriced (it starts decreasing in value the second you buy it, and prices continue to rise), and it's "insulting to notions of actual love." One survey found that the average engagement ring costs $5,200, and almost 12% of American couples actually spend $8,000 or more. Wouldn't that money be better spent on something else? If you think an engagement ring is a symbol of your love, consider this: "Why can't a beautiful home be a symbol? Why can't long-term investments be a symbol? Indeed, would it not be more impressive to show off a house than a finger rock?" 

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff - Posted Nov 4, 2013



Related articles and videos:

Song: Diamonds are forever          Shirley Bassey      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6kxcFcO6Y0

Song: Diamonds are a girl’s best friend   Marilyn Monroe    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCn4mTkxx2s

Wednesday 14 January 2015

Jan 16 2015 Blog Discussion

Please visit this site,...

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/WomensHealth/buy-love-materialism-marriage-killer-study-finds/story?id=14721071#.UOfSD6xYWSo

...read the article, and watch the video.

Consider your opinion regarding what they say.

See you in class!

Matthew

Monday 12 January 2015

Jan 13 2015 Discussion


Please have a look at the following article. We are going all the way to Korea for this one!
It is from 2011, but I'd like you to think about how it is related to Canada Goose jackets and MooseKnuckle jackets.

Be ready to discuss please.

http://mengnews.joins.com/view.aspx?gCat=050&aId=2945895

Matthew

Wednesday 7 January 2015

Jan 8 2015 Discussion

Please read this article (and watch the video) and consider your opinion. This one is pretty interesting and controversial I think.



We will be discussing it in class.

See you soon!

Matthew

Tuesday 6 January 2015

Jan 7 2015 Student Chosen Topic

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/01/tech/mobile/smartphone-new-years-resolution/index.html

Questions

1. Do you agree to this article, when don’t use your smartphone as much as you can?

2. Can you quit using your smartphone when you are bored? Are you addicted to your phone?
     If yes, what would you do in the meantime?

3. Do you think using a smartphone or tablet in front of young children has a bad influence?

4. Do you feel excited when your phone notifies you? How do you react if you leave your phone at home when you go to work or school?

5. Have you ever gotten in trouble for using your phone?

6. Some people seem addicted to reading books, do you think being addicted to a phone is different?

Sunday 4 January 2015

Jan 6 2015 Blog Discussion

Please read this article. I think it'll be pretty interesting. If you can think of other examples regarding this topic, or how people in your home country might think about this, be ready to discuss this.